Table of Contents

Outcome of the GENERA interview series

previous chapter

6. Reasons for domination of men in physics and existing barriers to women's success


The awareness of the gender discrimination and the knowledge on its determinants is considered as an important step towards gender equality change. In our study we asked physicists about the causes of men's domination in physics as well about the barriers that women may face in their career. It is important to underline that the concept of “domination” relates for some respondents not only to quantitative overrepresentation of men in the field, nor to their dominant presence in the governing or decision-making bodies. It is understood as a symbolic domination of which we will write below - the symbolic figure of a scientist being a man, and the masculine culture of physics within which some women feel isolated or unwelcome. Also important to add, that for a few respondents the numeric gender imbalance was not striking or not existing - Romania is an example of the post-socialist country where percentage of women is noticed to relatively high, similarly some fields witness more women presence:

Growing awareness of gender imbalance in physics

Among the processes that have been indicated most frequently as causing gender imbalance are: firstly, cultural stereotypes around abilities of women and men to pursue scientific career and secondly the difficulty of reconciling family and work and social expectations towards women's roles in family. These processes are not specific to physics, nor even to STEM.

We observe rather perfunctory attention paid to the topic by many interviewees, but also difficulty to disentangle the actual causes of this situation. There is a share of the respondents that admitted that they never gave a theme much attention, and that simply they do not have a ready answer as this is not their field of expertise:

Declared lack of knowledge about the causes of gender imbalance in physics did not necessarily paired with assumption that topic is not important to deal with - in some cases respondents sounded rather hopeless that the issue still pervade scientific world:

On the other end are located those who have gone through much reflection concerning their own trajectories in physics (particularly females) and the situation of female researchers. Moreover, they attempt to undertake actions (individual or systemic) in order to tackle the witnessed gender inequality or discrimination. These attitudes will be presented in this chapter.

These diverse positions nevertheless illustrate the important switch within discussion around the gender imbalance in physics from “the problem of women with physics” to the “problem of physics with women” (Götschel 2011)- thus, the community starts to express the concern over female low representation or even absence1). Particular activity is seen in Gender Equality Plan, and in around 36% of research performing organizations existed gender equality plans (EC 2015: 6; see as well chapter “Evaluation of institutions in fostering gender equality”).

Nevertheless, the voice that this topic is not of immediate worry for physics as a field, or that this is just how it is, is also present. Below there are three positions which assume a rather passive or negative attitude towards the implementation of measures to tackle gender imbalance:

Argument 1: Science is gender neutral with objective evaluation procedures. The respondents, more often men, stress the importance of rational evaluation and the ultimate importance of competence, knowledge, achievements and excellence on the career development and advancement. Gender is not considered an important criterion for evaluation and not seen as an important characteristic conditioning success.

Argument 2: This is not a problem, as in other field there is dominance as well (of men or women). The passive approach to the problem is based on the observation of a general tendency for men to dominate in academia (e.g. in Italy), or through juxtaposing physics to fields that face opposite situation - this “justifies” the dominance as a phenomenon.

Argument 3: Women just do not want to be physicists. The position assumes that each person makes a free choice on their profession, according to one's predispositions or interests, and that simply female students choose other fields. The lack of willingness to study physics is also witnessed by numbers of those who apply to study this discipline. A simple fact of students being more often male is causing the imbalance within staff.

External determinants: Impact of the socio-cultural context

The most commonly mentioned reasons for male domination in physics are located outside the field as such - there are embedded in cultural and historical context and relate to cultural norms and values. First of all, the respondents relate gender imbalance to the processes of socialization and reproduction of gender stereotypes in youth - these concern perception of girls' and boys' talents and predispositions to scientific work. Girls in their early years are “communicated” that science is not for them, and that boys are those who have “natural” talent for mathematics and “innate” technical skills. As our respondents indicate, these processes are mostly perpetuated through educational system (schools) and family, and they result in girls' low self-esteem in relation to mathematics, potentially and in practice, impacting their educational choices. Sometimes those cultural norms are so strong that they are treated as an objective difference, nevertheless most of the interviewees underlined the meaning of socialization, learning and internalizing stereotypes by children:

In the early years when a young girl decides to be a student of physics, or even to engage more deeply in the subject in school, the missing female role models are a problem. This lack leads young girls to questioning their vocation to be a physicist (on positive impact of role models see chapter “Mentorship”):

Secondly, the cultural expectations towards women's role within family are of critical importance - many respondents underlined the constraints resulting from the social expectations towards women engagement in family life, with her professional career being of secondary importance. These social expectations have further serious implications. One of the most often mentioned consequences is a priority of a male partner career over female partner' one.

The internalization of existing stereotypes of both women's lower capacities to pursue scientific career or concerning their primarily role as a mother can have diverse implications, which have been observed by the interviewees. First of all it may impact a choice of the career, but even if already in the field it may result in low self-esteem and doubts about one's capacities to pursue the career in physics, which can even cause women give up on the career in natural sciences. This was witnessed also in our study, as described in the part :“Career path…”, women more often voiced doubts about their talents and predispositions (this phenomenon is also known as impostor syndrome).

As showed above the “responsibility” for the imbalance is assigned to cultural context and early processes of socialization outside academic world, and many respondents indicated that the barriers for women to realize their careers are not within institution. This statement matched with the assurance on the fairness of the represented institution or even science as such, non-existence of discrimination, and the existence of adequate laws and regulations to prohibit that to happen.

While, most of the respondents hold the opinions about the socio-cultural context impact on the situation, some pinpointed objective differences between genders, their preferences or predispositions - they mention abstract or logical thinking that is easier for men, level of aggression, level of sociality, nonetheless they are not necessarily innate. Interestingly, even if sometimes admitting to some differences they could not be sure that they would have an impact on the career in physics.

Internal determinants: Androcentric vision of a scientist and growing importance of structural conditions

Second block of determinants of gender imbalance is related to the functioning of the field and its specificity. These arguments were less often mentioned by our respondents and included reflection over the specific features of the field that could potentially deter women from entering it. Some respondents listed the features of very style of working, stressing lonely character of theoretical work, the need to sacrifice for science or the necessity of enormous dedication to it. This vision of a scientist who is fully dedicated to science is androcentric thus not allowing for other engagements than scientific work - in this context family is a deterrent factor, that coincides with main duty of a scientist and the effects of such collision should be eliminated. This tale about “sacrifice to science” is seen in the interviews of both women and men, who underline the strenuous, often lonely, constant 24-hour brain work (see also chapter on “Work conditions…”):

At the same time, the recent developments in the field (or in academia in general), linked to work organization and structural conditions grow in importance. Three traits of the today's physicist career were underlined as potentially causing more challenges to women: precariousness, competitiveness, and demand for mobility. These challenges are believed to deter women from undertaking this career path - they are related though mostly to the experience of younger generation of physicists. These aspects of the scientific career are also challenging to the image of a scientist present in the above-described narrative of a person fully absorbed by the scientific problem - today the management of the career becomes additional duty of the scientist (see chapter on “Work conditions and environment”).

While these new demands are faced by both men and women, it is believed by respondents that women are less willing to work in these new conditions. Nonetheless, the analysis of other parts of interviews shows, they are in fact negatively evaluated by both genders. Here, when asking specifically for the obstacles to women career, they are believed to be more difficult to be tackled by women. In fact, these determinants appear even more as a challenge where matched with gender stereotypes concerning role of a wife or mother - precariousness or mobility appear most problematic when gender and family norms hold as actual.

Precariousness: Due to existing gender roles related to motherhood women seek more often than men stability in the career. As the period of family formation coincides with the time of unstable employment (usually, multiple post-docs with temporary contracts), this may be deterrent to women who would like to establish a family or already have one:

Demand for mobility: Intensive mobility is more difficult for women who have children or who are caregivers in more general sense. (See more in the chapter on mobility)

Competitiveness was mentioned as possibly deterring females from participation in the field. In fact, many female physicists in our study stressed the competitiveness as a part that they dislike about their work. On the other hand, there were critical voices underlining that competitiveness is not specific to physics and that it bothers both men and women.

There were also few comments concerning female preference of scientific field where the knowledge is more easily applicable to the external world over those fields that concentrate on basic research and theory. Some indicated as well that women like didactics and contact with students, which may deter them from undertaking work in research institutes that do not imply teaching duties. In the quote below it is interesting that the male respondents links the lack of choice of physics to the difficulties women may face in finding work - this is very symptomatic as the respondent immediately disclaims the possibility of scientific career of female graduates.

Between external and internal determinants - areas of challenges for women

The clash between cultural norms and internal organizational issues create difficult conditions for women's career - cultural norms that work in favour of men when matched with new principles for work organization can have even more deterrent effect for women's career. For example, although reconciling work and private life was already difficult in a linear and predictable model of career due to career breaks, now it become even more difficult to pursue a career when having children with a demand to leave for a post doc to another country.

“Male club” - experiences of being in minority

The domination of men in physics has important consequences for the work environment and the women's well-being at work. Women who enter the field, have to face the fact that they will be among the few of their gender. Our respondents describe different moments when they realized that they are in minority e.g. they noticed that the committee is only consisting of old men, or that they are the only female members of the research team. Some of them feel that being in minority may be uncomfortable - “you ask yourself if you are in the right place”, some underline that it may cause fear or discouragement. In one case the female researcher noticed that this even caused to her the crisis with her womanhood -women want to adjust so much to the field culture that they cease to wear dresses or make up (see chapter on “Female experiences of microagressions”):

As our study shows the masculine model of scientist is reproduced in different ways, from the androcentric model of work, to organization of space, ways of joking or communicating. This causes as well the lack of understanding of the different challenges that women may face in their career e.g. linked to parenthood. This may have consequences for institutional change as most governing bodies are consisted of men.

Some of the male physicists were aware that the way they behave may be a cause of unconscious discrimination as the style of communicating between men or symbols they use may be obsolete to females. Others are more critical and underline misogyny and lack of respect of the male colleagues towards the female researchers.

Female researchers in our study often talked about the consequences of being in a male dominated environment. The first group of consequences relates to discrimination, sexism and microagressions - these are discussed in a separate chapter “Physicists experiencing different treatment”. The second is linked to the notion of gender bias. It was noticed by the interviewees that women in physics need to women need to “prove double” to receive similar evaluation - there were voices in our sample indicating that for a women physicist to achieve success she must be much better than her male colleagues. Additionally, being a physicist means a contact process of proving that you are worth to be in the field.

Additional important consequence related to gender role and gender relations is the delegation of low prestige (and time-consuming) tasks to women e.g. taking notes during meetings, administrative tasks. Women are also often seen as teachers, and their engagement in didactics may cause lack of time to do research work.

Reconciliation of private life and work engagement

When the respondents are asked about the barriers to women success in physics, at the first place they underline the challenges women face with reconciliation of family and work. As noticed above the field is perceived as the one which demands sacrifice and presence in a workplace, mobility and dedication to publication, which can be difficult to realize when having care duties. On one hand respondents noticed how their careers or careers of their peers slowed down due to fact of having a child, on the other hand there is a realization that within the field there is a high number of those women who resigned from childbearing as it was difficult to reconcile with their career. While having family can have an impact also on male career (and as described e.g. in chapter on mobility it sometimes has), it is women who face social expectations linked to fulfillment of mother role. While respondents indicate that some institutional solutions can help in the management of family duties in the context of work (which will be further discussed in the chapter on Institutional aspects of gender equality), but they rather stressed the meaning of cultural expectations towards women and men in family, which are hard to change.

Interestingly even if the last respondent mentioned for a slowdown due to being mother to be “natural” and “undisputed”, in many cases the slowdown was not welcome and also not considered within evaluation, for example in a case of a Spanish institution, career breaks are not considered in the selection boards that have to evaluate the scientific production of the candidates. So, on one hand, most physicists praise the role of mother, or even “privilege to give life”, on the other hand the discipline does not accommodate it within its functioning - in fact also men are treated as they are family-less (also in the narrative around the career men rarely mentioned any private life events that had impact on their career, while many women did). On the contrary, in the new model of career most of the achievement should be gathered in the period of post-doc positions (after PhD), which coincides with time for family formation and reproduction - as described in the quote above, the expectation is for a dynamic and rapid advancement up to the moment of building independent research team. As stressed in the chapter on “Mobility…”, these new positions are often linked with the demand for settling in a new country or even multiple countries - in a situation when a partner/husband does not want to migrate this becomes practically impossible to realize. The importance of after-PhD phase for retaining women in science is stressed by many respondents:

Priority to male career in a double career couples

The cultural norms linked with family roles are playing an important role in the dual career couples experiences. It is admitted by the physicists that the priority for men career exists also in physics, and in the couples when both woman and man are scientists, it is a man who is more likely to continue.

The demand for mobility without accommodating the needs of double career couples causes a lot of challenges and results in long distant relationships. While such situation is not perceived as welcomed by the researchers, it usually forces one of the partners to resign from a career. Even in our interviews there was feeling of resignation by some of the respondents, they do not believe they can avoid this sacrifice:

Summary: The vicious circle of male domination in physics

We summarize the arguments discussed in this chapter in the illustration X. The vicious circle of male domination in physics starts from the simple numerical domination of men in the discipline resulting from the historical processes. The establishment of the androcentric model in physics is further strengthen by the cultural norms towards women and men roles in the family, as well as the stereotypes linked to the predispositions of girls and boys towards science and research. These processes most strongly impact early socialization as well as educational choices of girls and boys. This is also reinforced by the lack of female role models.

Figure 4. The vicious circle of male domination in physics

Source: Authors' elaboration.

When women enter the field (or university studies) they have to face the fact that they will be in minority and this bears certain consequences. The culture of physics is marked by the dominance of man, and the masculine model of scientist is reproduced in the androcentric model of work, to organization of space, ways of joking or communicating. This may result in experiences of overlooking women and other experiences of microagressions, sexism or even discrimination, as well as in gender bias. Additional set of factors) is linked to the organization of the field - work culture and conditions. Three factors are most relevant here: precariousness, competitiveness and demand of mobility. External and internal factors when clashing may create a difficult experience for women in physics - raising difficulties in reconciliation of private life with work, giving priority to male career, and necessity to deal with male dominance. All these may result in leaving science.

next chapter

1)
We have to stress here that the interviewees were volunteers who expressed interest in the study participation, so possibly they are more interested in the theme as such.